How To Make A Great Article Review

how to write an article review

Table Of Contents:

  1. What is an article review
  2. Purposes of article review writing
  3. How to prepare before article review writing
  4. How to write an article review
  5. Example of an article review

What is an article review

An article review is an evaluation of an article that is supposedly critical and constructive in nature. Article review is a professional kind of paper wherein, the arguments are presented in a well-structured manner. A good article review typically consists of statistics and reference to historical databases as evidence in support of the arguments made by the reviewer. The evaluation follows a certain field and is based on the summarization, categorization, analysis, and comparison of the article. In the case of scientific reviews, the review portrays the research by referring to database searches.

Writing the review of an article provides students or scholars with an opportunity to conduct work analysis and draw its comparison with the work of other authors in the same field. Experts outside the system of education review their peers’ work to bring originality and clarity to the field of study. Writing an article review requires comprehension of the depth of evaluation and analysis on the part of the reviewer. It is noteworthy that in an article review, the reviewer simply responds to the work of the other writer for the most part, rather than introducing new information. Any information, that is new and does not make part of the original article being reviewed is typically there because it supports or compliments the information contained in the article under review.

Purposes of article review writing

Understanding the purposes of article review writing is fundamental to writing a good article review. People find the opinions of other people informative. Reading the views of other people helps the reviewer decide if the information contained in the article can be deemed valuable or truthful and reliable. Article reviews are also useful for the reviewers. For example, journalists tend to find out the popularity of their opinion and what people think of it. Journalists may be interested in this because the understanding of their present state and awareness of the shortcomings helps them improve their work. Students are given the task of article review writing to improve their writing as well as critical thinking ability. Article review can serve as a means of attaining success in a short time. Especially when an article about a controversial issue is reviewed, the chances are that it will be read by a lot of people because the question is presently a hot topic for discussion and argument in the society. Writing reviews about such articles can give the reviewers instant exposure for their writing, and they can reach a lot of people with their review.

How to prepare before article review writing

It begins with a detailed and in-depth study of the article. The article that is supposed to be reviewed needs to be read with a view to checking a range of factors including the use of pathos and logos, and evidence in support of the arguments. The second step involves counter-checking the references the author has incorporated in the article. This helps the reviewer not only decide whether the said references are actually relevant to the subject, but also check their relevance today along with checking their validity and reliability. Finalizing the medium in which the review will be published, once it has been written is the next step. Different forums and platforms may have different requirements for an article review. Article review requirements can vary concerning the structure of review and number of words, for instance. The reviewer needs to familiarize himself/herself with the conditions before starting the writing. Several drafts go into the process of writing the review. The final version is a modification of different drafts that undergo the process of review and editing. It is important that the reviewer keeps the drafts in a safe place or directory inside the computer so that the work does not go waste as a result of unexpected problems in the computer or power supplies.  Finally, before starting the process of writing, the reviewer should try to fully comprehend the viewpoint of the author of the article by paying attention to details.

How to write an article review

An outline is a prerequisite of writing an article review. The reviewer should take the time to write a proper outline because a good outline can save the reviewer a lot of time and also streamline the process of writing. This is achieved by contemplating the sections that will make part of the article review. The reviewer should briefly decide the content and sources related to each section of the review. It is equally important to come up with the right order of presenting the information because the way arguments are concocted plays a fundamental role in making the article review sound convincing. In the second step, the reviewer builds the article review based on the outline. Proofreading is also a very important step in article review writing. The reviewer needs to read the article several times to notice words that can be replaced with more convincing and powerful words. The reviewer should try to reduce the bias in the review as much as possible. This can be achieved by paying attention to the points from the perspective of an outsider. Finally, the reviewer should verify that the references they use in support of the arguments are reliable and valid.

Example of an article review (The Role of God by George Hammond)

Published in the magazine Grass Over Grass, “The Role of God,” is an article written by George Hammond that has an infinite being as the primary focus. Hammond says that God surely cannot be seen, which serves to annul a specific role, though Hammond argues that the very role lessness of God makes us think about mystery and nothingness. The readers’ attention is grabbed by the fascinating correspondence between rolefulness and role lessness. Nevertheless, the hole in this philosophy is that Hammond denies the existence of God on the basis of lack of physical proof for his existence. I argue that God has to be conceptualized as being outside the world that can be sensed by the humans.

So many people in the history of the world claim to have seen, felt, and even spoken to God. Denial of these claims with a few statements is plainly erroneous. Amidst these blunders, Hammond does build a fairly sounding debate. He employs a deduction based step-by-step and structured approach towards building his narrative. Hammond, through his argument, constructs a bridge between religion and atheism, thus favoring both the institutions in a diplomatic manner.

I suggest the audience to read the article with an open mind. The reader should study mysticism before analyzing this article so that the debate can be feisty. This article offers content for a reader who wants their beliefs to be criticized or challenged.